Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Profit Greenly's avatar

Incredibly janky port of comments from my old WordPress site:

Warren Huska

2022-01-16 at 9:37 pm

Wonderfully done.

The question of bus-equivalence is an interesting one – the road damage on Don Mills in Toronto is notable – raised ‘bus knuckles’.

HOWEVER this does not remove the value of identifying and charging externalities to recoup subsidies.

As I am fond of saying to people who want a ‘road tax’ levied on cyclists, “I can’t wait for my rebate cheque”

Expand full comment
Profit Greenly's avatar

Incredibly janky port of comments from my old WordPress site:

Andrew

2021-03-25 at 11:07 pm

Another great article and captures the bulk of the issue. A few caveats worth mentioning from this traffic engineer:

– This all accelerates an order of magnitude where studded tires are allowed and the tire fees don’t come close to covering it.

-Road damage isn’t the only direct cost. The needed right of way, pavement, signals, etc needed to supply capacity in the form of new lanes (including bike lanes and sidewalks) is another factor. For vehicles, this points to a GPS tax structure that charges more at peak times. Less peak demand = smaller roads needed.

– Fundamental to this all is a transportation funding structure that makes new highways cheap, but does little for those outside a car, safety, etc. and creates unsustainable maintenance obligations at the state and local level.

– To venture into politics, this is one area where the “pay your own way/personal responsibility ” party is willfully blind to the massive suburban SUV subsidy.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts